Followers

Thursday, 1 August 2013

RBA Sabotaj Artikel Tun M , Jom Kita Lawan Balik !! SEBARKAN....


Pertamanya MMI nak ucapkan SYABAS kepada Tun Mahathir kerana penyiaran artikel tersebut.Walaupun ianya sudah di keluarkan oleh Facebook tetapi kesan daripada artikel tersebut menyebabkan banyak pihak perlu bertungkus-lumus berusaha untuk memastikan ianya di keluarkan.

Maka tindakan mereka-mereka itu sebenarnya membuktikan banyak pihak telah membaca isi kandungannya.TERBAIK TUN !!!

Mungkin ada di kalangan kita yang masih belum membaca artikel tersebut , tak mengapa jangan risau MMI bawakan artikel itu di bawah dan seperti biasa kepada semua pengamal media sosial SEBARKAN !!!

THE CHINESE DILEMMA
(NST 26/7/2013)

’KONGSI’ CONCEPT: Each side has to sacrifice something so that the other can gain something

IN response to the emergence of a Malay political party, Umno and its success in rejecting the British inspired Malayan Union, the Chinese community of the 1940s saw the need for a political party of their own to present their views to the British government.

Thus was the MCA conceived and born, led by Malacca's Sir Cheng-Lock Tan. Although it was intended to counter the influence of Umno and protect the interests of the Chinese community, events changed the strategy and role of the MCA.

In 1952 the Kuala Lumpur Umno leaders and the Kuala Lumpur MCA branch leaders decided that in the Kuala Lumpur municipal elections, they should not contest against each other, but instead should support each other's candidates in their respective constituencies.

The results startled them as they defeated almost all the non-racial parties. Realising the political advantage of cooperating with each other the Tunku (Abdul Rahman) and Sir Cheng-Lock Tan, and senior leaders of the MCA and Umno decided to formalise their cooperation by setting up the Alliance, a coalition of MCA and Umno.

The basis of this coalition was the idea of supporting each other and sharing the power gained. Buoyed by the success of the Alliance party in the 1955 elections, in which the MIC had joined, the Tunku looked more kindly at the proposal of Sir Cheng-Lock that citizenship should be based on jus soli (citizenship by being born in the country) and not jus saguinis (citizenship based on the Malaysian citizenship of the father or mother, i.e. citizenship based on blood relation).

The Tunku did not quite agree but he nevertheless decided to give one million citizenships to unqualified Chinese and Indians.

With that the confrontation between the Chinese and the Malays changed into positive cooperation.

It was a classic kongsi that was set up. The essence is an undertaking to share. Sharing involves a give and take arrangement, in which each side has to sacrifice something so that the other can gain something.

As the Malays made up the majority of the citizens they naturally led the Alliance. But the Chinese and Indians were not without adequate power. In any case Malay political power would be mitigated by Chinese and Indians' voting and economic power.

The Tunku saw immediate benefit from the "kongsi" as he believed Malays only wanted to be government employees and the Chinese wanted to be in business. There would be no conflict or tussle between them.

The Indians would fill up the professional posts. He did not foresee the days when government could not create enough jobs for the greatly increased number of Malays.

The kongsi Alliance worked well. But in 1963 Singapore joined Malaysia.

Immediately the PAP tried to gain Chinese support by condemning the Alliance kongsi for being disadvantageous to the Chinese. Malaysians, said the PAP, were not equal. There should be a Malaysian Malaysia where all the benefits should be based on merit alone, with the best taking everything, irrespective of race.

Without saying so in so many words the PAP was inferring that the Malays did not deserve their positions. The best people should rule the country. In the eyes of the PAP, Singapore was ruled by the best qualified people. That they happen to be almost all Chinese is incidental.

In the 1964 elections the MCA and Malaysian Chinese generally valued their cooperation with the Malays. They rejected the PAP and its chauvinistic appeal, giving it only one seat.

The Tunku realised what the PAP was up to and decided that Singapore should not be a part of Malaysia.But the PAP was not done. The remnant of the party in Malaysia set up the DAP to carry on the Malaysian Malaysia meritocratic formula for undermining Chinese support for the MCA.

Harping continuously on the so-called Malay privileges and the unfairness to the Chinese, the DAP slowly eroded the idea of kongsi in the multi-racial coalition of the Barisan Nasional.

Despite the fact that the Barisan Nasional supported Chinese education and the use of the Chinese language, the DAP convinced many Chinese that the Chinese, their culture and language are not given proper treatment by the Barisan Nasional coalition.

The MCA was attacked for not doing enough for the Chinese.nst 

Jelas mereka yang kini mengaku warganegara Malaysia sebahagiannya sudah semakin bongkak dan buta sejarah.MMI yakin tindakan mereka sehingga artikel di page milik Tun Mahathir di buang oleh Facebook merupakan isyarat bahawa puak-puak bangsat ini tidak akan berdiam diri , mereka akan terus-terusan mencuba malah mungkin akan sampai ke peringkat menentang sesiapa sahaja semata-mata untuk menutup sejarah yang sudah tertulis sejak sekian lama.

Bangsa Pendatang semakin melampau !!!

MMI

Kaum Cina Pun Di BANGSATkan Oleh Guan Eng !!


Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng dan bapanya, Lim Kit Siang tidak perlu khuatir dengan keputusan yang dibuat oleh Pendaftar Pertubuhan (ROS) berhubung kedudukan parti itu.

Menurut aktivis MIC, Datuk R. Ramanan, kedua-dua pemimpin tersebut boleh meneruskan sandiwara bagi meraih simpati kerana masyarakat Cina akan terus mempercayai mereka.

"Guan Eng dan Kit Siang amat bernasib baik kerana majoriti kaum Cina menganggap sandiwara mereka berdua seperti satu lagu yang amat merdu dan indah.

"Mereka pastinya telah ada skrip lakonan apabila ROS membuat keputusan berhubung isu penyelewengan dalam pemilihan Jawatankuasa Kerja Pusat (CEC) parti itu tahun lalu," katanya dalam satu kenyataan di sini hari ini.

Isu pemilihan CEC parti itu tahun lalu menimbulkan keraguan kerana didakwa wujud penyelewengan oleh ahlinya sendiri apabila DAP dikatakan gagal memberikan notis kepada 753 delegasi yang merupakan ahli sah dan layak mengundi pada hari tersebut.

Isu itu juga menimbulkan rasa tidak puas hati dalam kalangan pemimpin dan bekas pemimpin sehingga ada yang bertindak membawa kes itu ke mahkamah.

Ramanan berkata, ROS tidak harus teragak-agak untuk mengambil tindakan terhadap DAP berhubung isu pemilihan CEC parti berkenaan.

Secara sinis beliau berkata, Barisan Nasional (BN) pula perlu menerima hakikat bahawa kaum Cina pasti akan percaya dengan sandiwara Guan Eng dan Kit Siang itu.

"Mereka juga tidak peduli tentang manipulasi yang dilakukan oleh Guan Eng," katanya.

ROS jelas beliau, hanya perlu mengambil kira aduan-aduan daripada ahli DAP dan terus membuat keputusan mengikut peruntukan undang-undang.

"Pihak ROS harus tahu bahawa Melayu dan kaum India sudah tidak percaya lagi dengan sandiwara politik Guan Eng dan Kit Siang. Hanya kaum Cina yang percaya dengan lakonan mereka," katanya.

Sebagai contoh, jelas beliau, mereka semua percaya dengan 'drama tangisan' dan sandiwara Kit Siang tentang isi kandungan surat ROS bertarikh 17 April 2013.

Kepada ROS , MMI nak berpesan buat kerja elok-elok tak ada sesiapa yang akan kacau kerja buat ROS kerana dalam isu ini yang membuat laporan adalah ahli DAP sendiri.Oleh itu ambil tindakan yang sepatutnya sebab kaum cina sendiri pun tak percaya dengan cina-cina bangsat tu.

MMI

Labels